![]() ![]() After some back and forth, this is what emerged: "Boosting Network Performance" was a little bit to vague for me, so I opened a case and asked for more details. Per default, this setting is not added, so disabled by default. Put "NetworkSpeedInMbps=value" into notes.ini, where value is the network speed in megabytes 1 per second (Mbps) below which network performance will be "boosted".įor example, to boost performance when the network speed falls below 8 Mbps, specify "NetworkSpeedInMbps=8". Notes v12 notes 12 client network performance replicationĪccording to the documentation in HCL Notes 12, admins can use the notes.ini setting "NetworkSpeedInMbps" to "boost network performance" of Notes clients, when the network speed drops below a specified level. IMAP 266 Request: A17 FETCH 1:2 (INTERNALDATE UID FLAGS RFC822.SIZE BODY.PEEK BODYSTRUCTURE) IMAP 93 Response: A16 OK SEARCH completed IMAP 94 Request: A16 SEARCH UNDELETED SINCE 1 IMAP 366 Response: A15 OK SELECT completed IMAP/IMF/IMF 1055 subject: Test 002, from: subject: Testmail 001, from: (text/plain) IMAP 266 Request: A14 FETCH 1:2 (INTERNALDATE UID FLAGS RFC822.SIZE BODY.PEEK BODYSTRUCTURE) IMAP 93 Response: A13 OK SEARCH completed IMAP 94 Request: A13 SEARCH UNDELETED SINCE 1 IMAP 366 Response: A12 OK SELECT completed Lnav vs logtail windows#Once that is completed, Windows Mail will "work": So to fix this issue, create a full-text index on the mail database. Lnav vs logtail full#IMAP 102 Response: A8 NO SEARCH Database is not full text indexed IMAP 93 Request: A8 SEARCH UNDELETED SINCE 1 If you look at the pcap, Domino correctly reports "NO SEARCH Database is not full text indexed" which Windows Mail does not show anywhere. Which in itself might not be bad, but as Microsoft does not surface the servers response, the admin will be kept in the dark as to why Windows Mail does not fetch any mails. ![]() They decided to rely on ldap's computational expensive "SEARCH" command. Whereas at Microsoft apparently the Millenials never got beyond the "SEARCH" chapter in RFC 3501. IMAP/IMF/IMF 2760 subject: Testmail 001, from: subject: Test 002, from: (text/plain) IMAP 102 Request: 97 UID fetch 1,2 (UID RFC822.SIZE BODY.PEEK) ![]() IMAP/IMF/IMF 1015 subject: Testmail 001, from: subject: Test 002, from: (text/plain) IMAP 238 Request: 96 UID fetch 1:2 (UID RFC822.SIZE FLAGS BODY.PEEK) IMAP 80 Request: 95 UID fetch 1:* (FLAGS) IMAP 136 Response: 94 OK GETQUOTAROOT completed IMAP 365 Response: 93 OK SELECT completed Thunderbirds implementation to fetch mails in the inbox, it first selects the Inbox, then does an "UID fetch 1:*" (get all UIDs from message #1 onwards) and then downloads the individual mails. So I dug deeper and created some pcaps (because "pcap or it didn't happen"). So I tested with Mozilla Thunderbird and that worked like a charm. Intrigued by this tech puzzle on a Monday morning, I set out to recreate in my sandbox environment, and lo and behold, I had the same issue and even got an "0x8007274d" error: Domino IMAP for Windows Mail or When Millenials use Internet Protocolsĭomino imap microsoft windows mail imap4 0x8007274dĪ colleague reached out with a problem, that one of his customers is using Windows Mail (no judging please) to fetch mails from Domino via IMAP4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |